1

[REVIEW] Indiana OldIronside Fakes (4K VIDEO - IncognitoReviews) ( self )

submitted by IncognitoRev Warning: 0%

In this review, I'll be going over the new Indiana ID from OldIronside fakes. This IncognitoReviews ID was sent by as a review sample.


FOR FULL-RES AND EXTRA PHOTOS: https://imgur.com/a/KwudFCk
4K YOUTUBE OVERVIEW: https://youtu.be/EMZbPcIlc7A




Communication (10/10): OldIronside fakes remains one of my favorite companies to work with. The customer service team is responsive and the team in general is very accepting of criticisim and will always make the situation right. Response times are short despite the Chinese team.
Cost (9/10): $100 per ID with free duplicate runs on the premium end of IDs, but I believe this particular ID is worth every cent. Group prices will quickly erode at the cost of this ID, and free standard shipping with affordable rush shipping is a fantastic.
Shipping (10/10): This ID was shipped with the rush shipping option, which is an additional $15. It arrived two weeks from the day of the order being created: which I believe is phenominal for the price and with them being a Chinese vendor. The free shipping will take a slightly higher three weeks.
Photoshop (10/10): The photoshop on this particular example is fantastic, with the contrast looking perfect, and a great job being done on loose hairs. The window is murky and not as clear as the real deal, but the photo alignment is spot on with the real ID.
Template (10/10): One of the most true-to-life templates I have laid my eyes on. Color accuracy is the best I have seen from OIS, who I have found to usually fallen a little short of competitors in. Some areas need to be sharper, but the microprint is highly detailed. My only nitpick is that the font should be a little more thin.
Holograms/OVI (10/10): No OVI/Holos, but it's easy to pass off the "lazer etching" that would be on the real ID. Main nitpick about the transparent ghost window is the murky and gritty texture of this photo. It is hard to see through in bright light.
UV (8/10): The UV is decent on this card, but is a little fuzzy in some spots. The UV ink can sometimes be seen on the ID upon extremely close inspection with a bright light pointed at a weird angle.
Scanning (10/10): ID Scans fantastically. PDF417 data is properly encoded and the barcode looks to be formatted nearly identically.
Signature (10/10): Signature was slightly thickened and manipulated to look real. Looked like a legitimate signature. As a tip, this signature was done using a phone screen on Snapchat.

Conclusion (10/10): I personally believe this is one of the best and most accurate fakes OIS has on sale, which is incredible with how new it is. Only high light scrutiny shows flaws, so I would say it would pass in state at darker or less patrolled venues without much trouble at all.

Upvoted: IncognitoRev
Downvoted:
all 17 comments


1

Budgetfakes.com OG Vendor —

I love that u go all out in your reviews but the one thing still from before is u rated it perfect which is fine but how can it be perfect if u listed a few things wrong with so then it can't be perfect. A perfect 10 wouldnt need to be isp in darker or less patrolled venues because it's perfect. I'm not saying anything about the actual id here im saying what u say and then what u rate dont match up.


1

IncognitoRev [S] —

I appreciate your feedback. I have never seen a robust rating scale posted. I post my "overall" score with two things in mind:

Usability, and the FIDV Frontpage.

Usability: no vendor will be a 100% ID clone. Period. There will always be blurred microtext, or errors in photoshop, or some issue with the material layers. Something like that. I am detailed in my reviews and I point out EVERY tiny flaw. If I rated my overall score on only the negative things I said, every ID would get a low score. However- I believe this ID to be ISP and USABLE as an ID, regardless of a few small details that I noticed were not DMV quality.

Also, just look at other reviews. People will post fakes that simply wont scan or that have major security issues and they'll give it an 7 to 9 out of 10. 10/10 simply does not mean "flawless" like one would expect. Otherwise, I would assume no one would be giving them out.

FIDV Front page- Unfortunately, the FIDV frontpage automatically calculates a "total" score, which means the "overall" is not the "total", and I use the "overall" as a way to help weigh the final score in the direction I was thinking.

I would love to review some of your IDs. I have more fakes from OIS, Evolved, and 5th coming. Maybe then you would have a better understanding of my review process. I'm not just throwing these together, you know. It takes me and a partner about 3 hours per review with in-depth research, material testing, photo/video editing, scripting, and writing per ID.


1

Budgetfakes.com OG Vendor —

90% of reviews suck so using the front page as your guide doesn't fix anything. A 10/10 a 5/5 or anything thats perfect is what it is. So again im not saying this id is good or bad I'm saying u giving it a perfect 10 ratting then saying there is this flaw, and this flaw and then in conclution its isp only in dark or slow spots makes everything u said mean nothing. A girl cant be a 10 but only when the lights are off . Only reason im telling u this is you put a lot of time in these u can see that but then people will think of u like they thick of most reviews garbage . On the front page every id is a 9 or a 10 lol even ones that suck ass get a 9 or 10 on here. Nothing is perfect so lets go with that , if an id is not isp its not a 9 or 10 .


1

IncognitoRev [S] —

Well then I suppose my reviews are garbage as well. As a bouncer, I would let these IDs pass. They only fail under literally my microscope tests. I'll consider revising my rating scale but at this point, I would consider this ISP. And compared to any IDs, including the few reviews of yours I have seen, I consider this one the best I've seen.

If you have other problems, I encourage you to reach out to me professionally via DM or Wickr. Otherwise, I am left to assume you single out these reviews (and funnily enough, no one else's reviews) because of the vendors that I review, regardless of what you claim.


1

Budgetfakes.com OG Vendor —

See there u go again in your review u say its not isp unless u go to a dark or not a popular place and now its isp. My point u proved u can say what u want about me picking on u becauseof the vendor go and look at my posts i say it no matter who the vendor is and i would say it if it was my id no id is even and 8 even any of mine but im not even talking about the numbers its about what u said u cant have it a perfect id then shit on it and then now say its isp when u said it wasn't . i wont bother to say anything to u anymore since u dont really want to improve.


1

IncognitoRev [S] —

I do want to improve, but I would like you to speak [i]professionally[i/] with me so I don't have to try to understand your broken speech. Maybe you aren't understanding my regional dialect. I am new to the scene, but I back up what I said. This will pass in state but with caution. Maybe I need to say that so people like you can understand it.

I have ordered one of your IDs a few days ago and can not wait to get it in my hands and post a review. Maybe then you will be willing to respond to my emails with dignity and maturity.


1

HomeDepotEnthusiast —

Here's the thing though:
This is a polycarb state being printed on basic single piece PVC stock.
It is inherently not ISP, and I think that's why this post has 15 comments


1

[email protected] —

isn't the coloring on the clear window wrong? On the real one it should be yellow on the right


1

IncognitoRev [S] —

It does have a yellowish tint to it, but it doesn't appear as such with the blue background.


1

[email protected] —

Well I have one and it's definitely not the same as a real one, which should look like this: https://www.in.gov/bmv/images/license.jpg


1

TheDonDon —

UV ink can be seen on any id including real ones


1

IncognitoRev [S] —

This is more obvious than normal.


1

OldIronsidesFakes Vendor —

Thank you very much for your review and kindly advice!


1

LowSeratonin —

May I ask what you use to test scannability, my FYD id scans on the apps I test it with but messes up in gas stations.


2

IncognitoRev [S] —

Obviously, BCS is a good one to start with but has a bad reputation of being unreliable. I use generic PDF417 scanners to look at the formatting of the data


1

LowSeratonin —

do you just scan a real id and compare to the fakes formatting or how would I compare fakes to real id scans, I don't have any O21 ids to compare any of mine to.